After the AFC Bournemouth match, I discussed the repetitive excuses Sean Dyche consistently offers post-match, suggesting they should be viewed with some skepticism. Just like repeatedly complaining about a broken-down car, there comes a point where one must realize the car won’t magically run smoothly by simply turning the key. Everton, similarly, needs to recognize the need for a shakeup in their game-winning strategies.
Dyche did make several changes, such as Vitalii Mykolenko’s return at left back and the inclusion of Beto and Idrissa Gueye, which seemed sensible. However, the decision to play Ashley Young on the right side of midfield raised some eyebrows. Ben Godfrey’s continuous selection baffles me and raises doubts about Nathan Patterson’s future at the club if Dyche remains in charge.
Yet, despite these changes, did we witness any significant alterations in the team’s setup and approach during the match against Newcastle United? From my perspective, there weren’t any noticeable changes. Despite facing a depleted Newcastle side, Everton struggled once again. Although there was more intensity compared to the previous game, the overall game plan remained unchanged, regardless of its effectiveness. Newcastle capitalized on Everton’s sluggish start and took the lead in the 15th minute through Alexander Isak.
Everton failed to mount a significant response, only managing to reach halftime trailing by one goal. Although adjustments seemed necessary for the second half, the team returned unchanged and narrowly avoided conceding a second goal just before the hour mark. Dyche eventually made a triple substitution, injecting fresh energy into the team. While there were glimpses of improvement, with James Garner hitting the woodwork, Everton still had some nervy moments, with Mykolenko having to clear off the line to deny Isak another goal.